61879 |
THOMAS
MILTON Maddox, b. 1808 SC |
R1b1 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
16 |
16 |
37 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
12 |
22 |
21 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
|
94488 |
BENJAMIN Maddox b. 1736 MD CHANDLER Maddox bc 1776 MD |
R1b1c |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
16 |
16 |
37 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
12 |
22 |
21 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
|
105358 |
BENJAMIN Maddox b. 1736 MD William Maddox b. 1776 MD |
R1b1c |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
16 |
16 |
38 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
12 |
22 |
21 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
|
56495 |
BENNETT Maddox b. 1771 VA |
R1b1 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
16 |
16 |
37 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
12 |
22 |
21 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
|
97661 |
BENJAMIN Maddox b. 1736 MD Wm B. Maddox b. 1819 SC |
R1b1c |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101218 |
BENJAMIN Maddox b. 1736 MD Lawson Maddox b. 1784 SC |
R1b1c |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53302 |
RICHARD Maddox b.c. 1774 MD |
R1b1 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32875 |
SAMUEL Maddox b. 1790 MD |
R1b1 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
32 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47270 |
MARK Maddox, b.c. 1775 |
R1b1 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
37 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111036 |
JOSEPH BROWN Maddox |
R1b1c |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
18 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
16 |
16 |
37 |
39 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many members of this Abbeville
group feel data supports they descended from the Cornelius of Charles Co., MD
line, others are unclear and we all continue to search... thought to have
migrated from England to MD to VA to SC to GA to AL... Please note other
non-matching Maddox DNA lines also feel they descended from the Cornelius
line as well, so this linage needs to be continously researched. We are very
interested in adding more DNA lines to this chart, especially if you have
solid data documenting your lineages. If you do match this line or have an
interest in studying this line, we highly recommend reviewing this
publication... www.maddoxgenealogy.com/book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10794 |
EDWARD Maddox b.c. 1615 ENG/WLS UK_Wm |
R1b1 |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
18 |
17 |
38 |
39 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
11 |
22 |
20 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
|
11711 |
EDWARD Maddox b.c. 1615 ENG/WLS UK_Thomas |
R1b1 |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108434 |
EDWARD Maddox b.c. 1615 ENG/WLS __Benjamin F. |
R1b1c |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75247 |
EDWARD Maddox b.c. 1615 ENG/WLS __George B. |
R1b1 |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
18 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
18 |
17 |
38 |
39 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
11 |
22 |
20 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
|
11475 |
RICHARD WILLIAMS b. 1685 WLS UK |
R1b1 |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
18 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
18 |
17 |
37 |
39 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
15 |
8 |
11 |
22 |
20 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
|
115347 |
JACKSON WILLIAM Maddox, b. 1842 Clark Co., GA |
R1b1 |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
18 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
18 |
17 |
37 |
38 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
11 |
22 |
20 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
|
106154 |
DAVID T. Maddox b. 1804 GA USA |
R1b1b2 |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72775 |
DAVID Maddux b. 1773 DE |
R1b1 |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
18 |
17 |
36 |
39 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
11 |
22 |
20 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
|
100836 |
ALEXANDER Maddux b. 1613 ENG/WLS__Wilford |
R1b1 |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
18 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
38 |
38 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
17 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
11 |
22 |
20 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
|
19702 |
ALEXANDER Maddux b. 1613 ENG/WLS__Thomas |
R1b1 |
13 |
23 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58085 |
TAPLEY Maddux b.c. 1778 VA USA > TN USA |
R1b1 |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
18 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
18 |
17 |
38 |
39 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
8 |
11 |
22 |
20 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
|
This DNA line also feels data
supports their descendent from Cornelius of Charles Co., MD. As with all genealogical research, more
needs to be done. This specific data
would suggest that Alexander of Somerset Co., MD, was related to Cornelius of
Charles Co., MD. These two lines are only a genetic distance of one apart. It
is believed that Alexander was the brother of Edward, And that their father
was Thomas who immigrated from London to Jamestown, VA, in 1620. We have
located three WILLIAMS descendants who are an exact match to this line. One
of the Williams matches still lives in Wales. Back at the time of selecting
last names (around time of Oliver Cromwell), did one branch of the family
select Maddox and the other branch select Williams? David b. 1773 DE seems to
be a near relative of Alexander, but we do not yet know how. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21313 |
JOHN
Maddox b.c. 1667 WLS/ENG UK_Daniel |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
10 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
36 |
40 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
8 |
12 |
22 |
19 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
|
32403 |
JOHN Maddox b.c. 1667 WLS/ENG UK_Claiborne |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25616 |
JOHN Maddox b.c. 1667 WLS/ENG UK_Wm |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112140 |
Philip Maddocks (WILLIAM Maddocks b. 1790 Surrey, ENG, UK) |
R1b1b2 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
28 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35166 |
JOHN Maddox b.c. 1667 WLS/ENG UK_Nathan |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30055 |
JOHN Maddox b.c. 1667 WLS/ENG UK_Daniel |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
10 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
36 |
40 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29381 |
JOHN Maddox b.c. 1667 WLS/ENG UK_John |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
10 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
36 |
40 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31774 |
JOHN Maddox b.c. 1667 WLS/ENG UK_Thomas |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
10 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
17 |
16 |
36 |
40 |
11 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67004 |
MICHAEL Maddox b.c. 1748 VA |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
10 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
36 |
40 |
11 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those who had no idea who their
oldest-known ancestor descended from have found some kind of relationship
with immigrant John Maddox whose son lived in Goochland Co., VA. Those who
are close but not an exact match may have descended from John's uncle or another
of John's relatives back in England or Wales.
Among them were descendants from Charlotte Co., VA. Others who thought
they were related only based on circumstantial evidence ~ Nathan and William
of Bedford Co., VA, now have stronger proof. Still others who had always
thought they descended from this popular line have found they are not, so now
are able to focus their attention on other good possibilities. Several of
John’s sons have never been researched. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45086 |
SAMUEL
Maddox, b.c. 1646 MD/WLS _ James D. |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
10 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
13 |
37 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20561 |
SAMUEL Maddox b.c. 1646 MD/WLS_Justinian |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58994 |
SAMUEL Maddox b.c.1646 MD/WLS_John Wesley |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44459 |
SAMUEL Maddox b.c. 1646 MD/WLS_Ledoux b. 1865 MD |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
10 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
13 |
37 |
37 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24378 |
SAMUEL Maddox b.c.1646 MD/WLS_ Samuel |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
9 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31294 |
SAMUEL Maddox b.c. 1646 MD/WLS_Notley Warren |
R1b1 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
18 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
29 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several who always thought, due to strong circumstantial
evidence, that they descended from immigrant Samuel Maddox of St. Mary’s Co.,
MD, now have their final proof. Most migrated to the “deep south.” It had
been thought that Samuel of DE (24378) was of Alexander Maddux’s line, but
they now have proof that he is of Samuel’s line instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26256 |
JAMES
Maddox b.c. 1750 FRANCE_Samuel |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
13 |
14 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
18 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
18 |
28 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
16 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25304 |
JAMES Maddox b.c. 1750 FRANCE_James |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
13 |
14 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
18 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
18 |
29 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11492 |
JAMES Maddox b.c. 1750 FRANCE_Wm |
R1b |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
13 |
14 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
18 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
18 |
29 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56388 |
JAMES Maddox b.c. 1750 FRANCE_Charles |
R1b1c |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
13 |
14 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a new and fascinating line of Maddoxes from France, as
explained by descendant Mark Maddox b. 1844, who in a letter stated that his
family came from France a hundred years earlier (3 generations) around 1767
at the end of the French and Indian War. He had planned to settle in Canada,
but the British won the war, so he settled in the future United States on the
York River. Mark’s grandfather, Samuel, is first found in Lancaste4r SC circa
1800 as is James; they are probably brothers. Some descendants migrated to GA
and SC. William’s and Charles' line went to Lincoln Co., TN, and were
probably brothers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JAMES
DANIEL Maddox b. 1842 SC USA |
R1b1b2 |
13 |
25 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
16 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
18 |
30 |
15 |
16 |
16 |
17 |
|
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
17 |
16 |
18 |
17 |
38 |
40 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
21 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
17 |
8 |
12 |
25 |
20 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
42575 |
ADAM Maddux b.c. 1786 USA |
R1b1 |
13 |
25 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
14 |
14 |
30 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
18 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
17 |
16 |
18 |
18 |
38 |
40 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23987 |
ELIJAH Maddox b. 1765 VA USA |
R1b1 |
13 |
25 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21694 |
ELIJAH Maddox b. 1765 VA USA |
R1b1 |
13 |
25 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
18 |
30 |
15 |
16 |
16 |
17 |
10 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
17 |
16 |
18 |
17 |
39 |
41 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38789 |
ELIJAH Maddox b. 1765 VA USA |
R1b1 |
13 |
25 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
14 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
18 |
30 |
15 |
16 |
16 |
17 |
10 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
17 |
16 |
19 |
17 |
39 |
41 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adam and James Daniel are a
genetic distance of one from each other. They are also a genetic distance of
one from Elijah, but through different markers. James Daniel was in SC. The
others were in TN, a natural migration pattern for that time. However, Elijah
was born in VA. Did he go to TN to join nearby family members? James Daniel’s
family ended up in MO. So did most of the others. Adam’s “ux” spelling
pattern indicates descendancy from Alexander, but that is not the case
according to DNA results. It is believed that Adam was brother to Nathaniel,
Joseph, and Scholfield in Cocke Co., TN, at the same time, and that their
father was Matthew, an older Maddox in that county. Both Elijah and Matthew were strong leaders
in the Baptist Church in TN. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DANIEL
Harrison Maddox b. 1774 SC > GA |
R1b1 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
20 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
19 |
11 |
12 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
18 |
19 |
38 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63982 |
DANIEL Harrison Maddox b. 1774 SC > GA |
R1b1 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
20 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20595 |
LITTLEBERRY Franklin Matlock b.c. 1785 SC > VA > TN >
AL |
R1b1 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
28 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
20 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Harrison Maddox was born
in SC during the Revolutionary War. He was in the same county in GA
(Gwinnett) as Revolutionary War veteran John G. Maddox. Also in Gwinnett Co.
in 1820 were William, John, Fielding and Benjamin ~ all in Daniel's age category.
We would like to find descendants of these lines willing to do the DNA test. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87615 |
JOSIAH
Maddox b. 1801 VA |
R1b1 |
13 |
23 |
14 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
15 |
19 |
31 |
15 |
17 |
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a new line from VA that
migrated to both TN and KY. This is not a match to the Goochland Co., VA,
line that so many have believed were related. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106179 |
AQUILLA
Maddox b.c. 1790 MD |
R1b1c |
13 |
24 |
14 |
10 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
17 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
30 |
14 |
16 |
17 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
23 |
16 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
37 |
38 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
15 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
12 |
23 |
23 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
15 |
8 |
12 |
22 |
21 |
14 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
|
There have been three Aquilla's
located in early US: Aquilla a cooper b. MD 1812 was found in Jefferson Co.,
WV 1880. Aquilla a cooper b. MD 1811 and died prob. Boone Co., MO. And this
Aquilla whose DNA is not quite close enough to consider him related to the
other two (#59137). However, they were both in Frederick/Washington Co., MD.
Perhaps a retesting is in order. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|